|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 93 post(s) |
|
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
111
   |
Posted - 2012.10.29 09:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Rumor mongering about ISD is a bad thing, people.
CCP Eterne | Community Representative
@CCP_Eterne |
|
|
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
328
|
Posted - 2012.11.11 14:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
LCO, if you wish to know the specifics of your ban and who issued it, because for some reason you did not receive proper notification through the system, please file a petition. If you feel there is some sort of "exploit" that allows CCL to issue bans (there isn't, but let's assume there was), you should also send a petition so that we can immediately investigate it.
That is the ONLY proper way to deal with this issue. Continuing to hound ISD when you have been explicitly informed that what you are claiming is not possible is swiftly approaching harassment.
CCP Eterne | Community Representative
@CCP_Eterne |
|
|
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
341
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 10:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
It seems apparent that Suvetar was not referring to doing sensible cleanup or editing out potentially offensive content from a quote, but rather specifically using the quote function in a manner to deliberately deceive or mislead.
CCP Eterne | Community Representative
@CCP_Eterne |
|
|
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
560
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 17:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:Thanks for the explanatory response for that particular instance, but I was using it as an example only. I wasn't particularly interested in getting the reason for that instance, so much as a statement about how the moderators *should* generally be treating duplicating threads versus (perhaps) how they *are* treating them.
My gut feel, and I freely admit that my gut may be leading me astray, is that absent some super-compelling reason, the older thread should be allowed to stand and the newer one be locked with a reference back to the older thread.
[...]
At the time that the moderator made the explanatory post (21:04), the newer thread had 8 posts in it. Furthermore, none of those posts seem to constitute a super-compelling reason for this duplicate thread to be spared the lock.
If duplicate thread locking depends solely upon moderator judgment, then I think the moderator is in error in this instance. If duplicate thread locking has a formal rule component, please provide it so that we can determine where it may need adjustment.
In this instance, the older thread was locked because the newer one specifically involved something a dev (in this case, myself) said that was relevant to the discussion.
In the general case, we prefer to lock the thread which has gotten the most discussion in it. In most cases, that is the oldest thread, but at times it can be a newer thread (for whatever reason).
Community Representative GÇ+ EVE Illuminati GÇ+ Fiction Adept
@CCP_Eterne GÇ+ @EVE_LiveEvents |
|
|
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
566
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 23:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:In the general case, we prefer to lock the thread which has gotten the most discussion in it. In most cases, that is the oldest thread, but at times it can be a newer thread (for whatever reason). Surely you've made a mistake above. You don't really have a rule saying "when facing duplicate threads, lock the one with the most discussion in it." That would be beyond silly. MDD
Derp. I meant to say we prefer to leave the one with the most discussion OPEN.
Sorry for the mistake.
Community Representative GÇ+ EVE Illuminati GÇ+ Fiction Adept
@CCP_Eterne GÇ+ @EVE_LiveEvents |
|
|
|
| |
|